Georgia Attorney Lawyer

What does it really cost to raise a child? And since it is much more expensive to raise children in a house arrest of two - for example, in which the child lives primarily with mother, she goes to Dad’s for every second weekend and half on vacation?

If you find the answer, you’re still just halfway to find a solution to the issue of child just many governments to support consumption in the world. The next challenge is a formula for parents separated right to share the cost of increasing their children - recognizes the fact that both parents need a house and a household, manage, when children in their supply.

At the Superior Court of Georgia to the USA on these issues during the past month, he wound up tossing their child to support the compatibility guidelines on the Constitution. The Tribunal found that the guidelines was “hastily adopted and are not modified without adequate verification of relevant economic data” as regards the costs of educating children, and has declared as “arbitrary and capricious” .

Taking care of the child Australian formula is wide open for similar expenses. When he learned the decision of Georgian, Federal Labour Hinterbänkler Roger Price could not help an ironic laugh nervously. “Yesterday, a court raises a formula care of the child, similar problems which, with whom we have yesterday.”

In 1994, the award is chaired by a cross-party federal parliamentary committee which, as the judge in Georgian, came to the conclusion of Australian parents pay for child care have been forced to transfer amounts of money which falls insufficient data on the costs of educating children. The Committee recommends unanimously, the revision formula, with up-to-date research.

With the Ministry launched in 1999 for community and family Services (FACS), the costs of research and education of children, conceived as changes in the formula.

This led right that the proposed reduction of the maximum amount of the Child to which high-income parents must pay, and minor amendments so that more money for the cost of our non-custodial parents for ( or parents, please ask how it is called now), To have children in their countries of origin of more than 10 percent of the year. But the concern that it would allow a reduction in child benefit payments support, to a certain residence (formerly “deprivation of liberty”) has led parents to block vital changes in the Senate, and many thousands of ‘Australians paid child locked on the support base, which had established illegitimate. The price is of the opinion that when introducing reforms for failures that has recognized these shortcomings, discredits the child support.

“The tragedy, we have reached the stage where the current regime is almost the same cast, because it replaces the system.” Everyone, whether government or opposition, knows the formula does not work, but we have no political will to act. ”

In Australia, hope is reform in the political process and not the courts, because our legal system fails to offer protection mechanisms available on the American system, as the Bill of Rights. “But a lot of arguments, won where the Georgian have relevance yesterday. For example, Georgian Court held that the Georgian prices include child care” as large quantities hidden Powers “, that non - parent was not often in ‘The financial needs of children when they are in their care. The Tribunal found, it was not in the best interest of the child.

These “hidden alimony” aims to preserve the quality of life of the child care, much more than the actual costs of increasing the child. Mark Rogers, The Economist, as most economic arguments, the court decision, Georgian, says he is the non-economic sense, support the child on this basis.

“From an economic viewpoint, it is impossible to view, there is a resolution of the standard of living, if the family divided into two households, without a charge for non-parents,” he said last week , From his office Georgian.

A high level of support for child Australian debts have sometimes been defended as an effort to conserve the separation of pre-standard of living of children. The folly of this argument is shown in the latest work of researchers at Macquarie University Paul Henman, in conjunction with the analyst of social policy, Kyle Mitchell, which show that since both have their residence and contact Parents are required budget for the infrastructure of the child - - One bedroom, clothing, foodstuffs, Etc. .. — Children of all costs increase significantly after the separation. Your research, 2001 published in the Journal of Social Policy, pointed out that “for contact with a child under 20 percent this year, the cost of contacts represents about 40 per cent of annual costs for the same child in an intact home with an average income and more than half the annual cost to the child in a household with low incomes. ”

Hence, a child costs up to 50 per cent more than the separation of the family intact.

The search for FACS Murray Woods and Associates showed many parents to exercise contact was a “real battle” to act on the tours, especially the people some distance from their children.

Kyle Mitchell, research indicates contact with costs demonstrates the need for changes on the German market formula. “The formula was in the year 1987, except that little data on the cost of children and none on the costs of contact. The formula does not take explicit account the costs of contact, but it is alleged that some small steps quantified in the allocation percentage of the amount of the formula, “he said.

The proposed regulation is rejected, representing a decrease of two or three percentage points for the provision of care payers contact Mitchell as a change “minimum bearable and a balanced reform, the costs of contact with reality Because many parents do not live already received many child support. ”

Mitchell says that “this is the key to the perception of legitimacy, it explicitly takes account of certain costs contact. Furthermore, to correct the formula, where higher incomes, parents residents pay much more than the total income high intact couples spend their children.

These issues are currently discussed in many countries, and several have focused on reforms. United Kingdom adopted a new formula which reduces the care of the child by one-seventh of all responsibility for a seventh year that the child spends in contact with care.

Norway has also a radical change in the direction of a fairer system. Last year, the government has passed laws on the basis of close child care up to the actual cost of educating children. The conservative estimates of costs are increasing each child, then between parents, with the full deduction contact.

While opponents of reform to propose modalities of increased discrimination on the resident parent households, Norwegian Labour MP Jon Olav Alstad rejected those arguments. “For the Labour Party, the important issue was the development of a system where children are the first and have the possibility of contact with both parents to maintain, after the Break-up,” he said.

Anne Skevik, an associate scientist at the Norwegian Institute, Social Research, said in a document recently in the reforms, insofar as the politicians involved, what was important and parents … The most important thing, a child care system should do, it was the promotion of broad contact with the child of both parents. “